DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2016 Nissan AD Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeNissan
ASXModelAD
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1498 cc
114 HPPower109 HP
270 NmTorque148 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank41 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears4
YesABS—

Dimensions

4295 mmLength4395 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1625 - 1635 mmHeight1500 mm
1355 KgWeight—
2670 mmWheelbase2600 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi ASX and 2016 Nissan AD approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…