DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Honda FIT vs 2016 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

HondaMakeMitsubishi
FITModelASX
2016Model year2016
HatchbackBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1497 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
110 HPPower114 HP
134 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typeDiesel
32 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption5,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears6
—ABSYes

Dimensions

3955 mmLength4295 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1525 mmHeight1625 - 1635 mm
1080 KgWeight1355 Kg
2530 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Honda FIT and 2016 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…