2016 • Ford
Figo
Ford Figo 1.5 Ti-VCT (112 Hp) 2016Overall Score61.5/100
2016 Ford Figo vs 2016 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Mitsubishi
ASX
Mitsubishi ASX 1.6 DI-D (114 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi ASX
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Ford FigoSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
FordMakeMitsubishi
FigoModelASX
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Ford FigoSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
—0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1499 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
112 HPPower114 HP
136 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Ford FigoSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
42 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption5,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Ford FigoSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
175/65 R14Tyre size—
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Ford FigoSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
3995 mmLength4295 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1525 mmHeight1625 - 1635 mm
—Weight1355 Kg
2491 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Ford Figo and 2016 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…