2016 • Nissan
AD
Nissan AD 1.5i (109 Hp) 2016Overall Score61.5/100
2016 Nissan AD vs 2016 Mitsubishi ASX Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Mitsubishi
ASX
Mitsubishi ASX 1.6 DI-D (114 Hp) 2016Overall Score62.25/100
WINNER
Mitsubishi ASX
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
61.5–62.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Nissan ADSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
NissanMakeMitsubishi
ADModelASX
2016Model year2016
EstateBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5
Performance
Nissan ADSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
—0–100 km/h11,2 s
0 km/hTop speed182 km/h
1498 ccEngine displacement1560 cc
109 HPPower114 HP
148 NmTorque270 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Nissan ADSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
41 ltFuel tank63 lt
—Urban consumption5,2 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption4,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Nissan ADSpecificationMitsubishi ASX
4395 mmLength4295 mm
1695 mmWidth1770 mm
1500 mmHeight1625 - 1635 mm
—Weight1355 Kg
2600 mmWheelbase2670 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Nissan AD and 2016 Mitsubishi ASX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableDacia Duster vs Nissan AD2016 and 2016 model years
VSImage unavailableInfiniti Q30 vs Nissan AD2016 and 2016 model years
VSImage unavailableMazda 3 vs Nissan AD2016 and 2016 model years
VSImage unavailableMazda 2 vs Nissan AD2016 and 2016 model years
VSImage unavailableDacia Lodgy vs Nissan AD2016 and 2016 model yearsComments are loading…