DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2016 Honda FIT Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeHonda
ASXModelFIT
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1497 cc
114 HPPower110 HP
270 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
63 ltFuel tank32 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
6Gears—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4295 mmLength3955 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1625 - 1635 mmHeight1525 mm
1355 KgWeight1080 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi ASX and 2016 Honda FIT approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…