DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mitsubishi ASX vs 2016 Ford Figo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi ASX

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.25–61.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeFord
ASXModelFigo
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

11,2 s0–100 km/h—
182 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1560 ccEngine displacement1499 cc
114 HPPower112 HP
270 NmTorque136 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
63 ltFuel tank42 lt
5,2 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
4,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears6
—Tyre size175/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4295 mmLength3995 mm
1770 mmWidth1695 mm
1625 - 1635 mmHeight1525 mm
1355 KgWeight—
2670 mmWheelbase2491 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mitsubishi ASX and 2016 Ford Figo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi ASX leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…