DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Airtrek vs 2003 BMW Z3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Airtrek

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.5–59.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeBMW
AirtrekModelZ3
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeCabriolet
5Seats2
4Doors2

Performance

—0–100 km/h10,4 s
0 km/hTop speed196 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1895 cc
126 HPPower118 HP
173 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank51 lt
—Urban consumption11 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size225/50 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4410 mmLength4050 mm
1750 mmWidth1740 mm
1550 mmHeight1288 mm
1330 KgWeight1220 Kg
2626 mmWheelbase2446 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Airtrek and 2003 BMW Z3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Airtrek leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…