DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZS vs 2003 Mitsubishi Airtrek Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZS

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeMitsubishi
ZSModelAirtrek
2003Model year2003
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors4

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
193 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
113 HPPower126 HP
260 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
55 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,8 ltUrban consumption—
4,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
205/50 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4520 mmLength4410 mm
1700 mmWidth1750 mm
1390 mmHeight1550 mm
1225 KgWeight1330 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2626 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZS and 2003 Mitsubishi Airtrek approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZS leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…