DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 BMW Z3 vs 2003 Mitsubishi Airtrek Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mitsubishi Airtrek

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.

59.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BMWMakeMitsubishi
Z3ModelAirtrek
2003Model year2003
CabrioletBody typeOff-road vehicle
2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,4 s0–100 km/h—
196 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1895 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
118 HPPower126 HP
190 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank60 lt
11 ltUrban consumption—
6 ltExtra-urban consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
225/50 R16Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4050 mmLength4410 mm
1740 mmWidth1750 mm
1288 mmHeight1550 mm
1220 KgWeight1330 Kg
2446 mmWheelbase2626 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 BMW Z3 and 2003 Mitsubishi Airtrek approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mitsubishi Airtrek leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…