2003 • Rover
25
Rover 25 2.0 TD (113 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
2003 Rover 25 vs 2003 Mitsubishi Airtrek Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • Mitsubishi
Airtrek
Mitsubishi Airtrek 2.0 (126 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
WINNER
Rover 25
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Airtrek
RoverMakeMitsubishi
25ModelAirtrek
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors4
Performance
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Airtrek
9,1 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
113 HPPower126 HP
260 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Airtrek
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
6,5 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Airtrek
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/65 R14Tyre size215/60 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Rover 25SpecificationMitsubishi Airtrek
3990 mmLength4410 mm
1688 mmWidth1750 mm
1419 mmHeight1550 mm
1130 KgWeight1330 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2626 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Rover 25 and 2003 Mitsubishi Airtrek approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…