DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Mitsubishi Airtrek vs 2003 Rover 25 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Rover 25

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MitsubishiMakeRover
AirtrekModel25
2003Model year2003
Off-road vehicleBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,1 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1997 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
126 HPPower113 HP
173 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
60 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption6,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
215/60 R16Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4410 mmLength3990 mm
1750 mmWidth1688 mm
1550 mmHeight1419 mm
1330 KgWeight1130 Kg
2626 mmWheelbase2500 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Mitsubishi Airtrek and 2003 Rover 25 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Rover 25 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…