DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Volkswagen Bora Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeVolkswagen
ZRModelBora
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h11,5 s
185 km/hTop speed192 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1896 cc
113 HPPower115 HP
260 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption8,0 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,1 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears6
205/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4011 mmLength4409 mm
1690 mmWidth1735 mm
1400 mmHeight1485 mm
1155 KgWeight1365 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2515 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Volkswagen Bora approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…