2003 • Toyota
Hiace
Toyota Hiace 2.0 i(110 Hp) 2003Overall Score59.5/100
2003 Toyota Hiace vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2003 • MG
ZR
MG ZR 2.0 TDi (113 Hp) 2003Overall Score60.25/100
WINNER
MG ZR
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota HiaceSpecificationMG ZR
ToyotaMakeMG
HiaceModelZR
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
8Seats5
4Doors3/5
Performance
Toyota HiaceSpecificationMG ZR
—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
110 HPPower113 HP
167 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota HiaceSpecificationMG ZR
DieselFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
11,9 ltUrban consumption7,7 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota HiaceSpecificationMG ZR
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
195/85 S R14Tyre size205/50 R16
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota HiaceSpecificationMG ZR
4615 mmLength4011 mm
1690 mmWidth1690 mm
1935 mmHeight1400 mm
—Weight1155 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2502 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2003 Toyota Hiace and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…