DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Hilux vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Toyota HiluxSpecificationMG ZR
ToyotaMakeMG
HiluxModelZR
2003Model year2003
Pick-upBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
4Doors3/5

Performance

Toyota HiluxSpecificationMG ZR
—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1995 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
110 HPPower113 HP
167 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Toyota HiluxSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
0 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Toyota HiluxSpecificationMG ZR
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Toyota HiluxSpecificationMG ZR
4690 mmLength4011 mm
1690 mmWidth1690 mm
1650 mmHeight1400 mm
—Weight1155 Kg
2850 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Hilux and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…