DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 Toyota Regius vs 2003 MG ZR Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

59.5–60.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Toyota RegiusSpecificationMG ZR
ToyotaMakeMG
RegiusModelZR
2003Model year2003
MinivanBody typeHatchback
4Seats5
3Doors3/5

Performance

Toyota RegiusSpecificationMG ZR
—0–100 km/h10,0 s
0 km/hTop speed185 km/h
1998 ccEngine displacement1994 cc
110 HPPower113 HP
167 NmTorque260 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Toyota RegiusSpecificationMG ZR
PetrolFuel typeDiesel
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
—Urban consumption7,7 lt
—Extra-urban consumption4,2 lt
—Average consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Toyota RegiusSpecificationMG ZR
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size205/50 R16
—ABSYes

Dimensions

Toyota RegiusSpecificationMG ZR
4430 mmLength4011 mm
1690 mmWidth1690 mm
1980 mmHeight1400 mm
1450 KgWeight1155 Kg
2330 mmWheelbase2502 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 Toyota Regius and 2003 MG ZR approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…