DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Toyota Hiace Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationToyota Hiace
MGMakeToyota
ZRModelHiace
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats8
3/5Doors4

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationToyota Hiace
10,0 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
113 HPPower110 HP
260 NmTorque167 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationToyota Hiace
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption11,9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationToyota Hiace
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears—
205/50 R16Tyre size195/85 S R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationToyota Hiace
4011 mmLength4615 mm
1690 mmWidth1690 mm
1400 mmHeight1935 mm
1155 KgWeight—
2502 mmWheelbase2330 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Toyota Hiace approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…