DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Suzuki Escudo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationSuzuki Escudo
MGMakeSuzuki
ZRModelEscudo
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody type—
5Seats—
3/5Doors—

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationSuzuki Escudo
10,0 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1995 cc
113 HPPower140 HP
260 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationSuzuki Escudo
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationSuzuki Escudo
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain—
5Gears—
205/50 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationSuzuki Escudo
4011 mmLength—
1690 mmWidth—
1400 mmHeight—
1155 KgWeight—
2502 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Suzuki Escudo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…