DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Saab 9-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationSaab 9-3
MGMakeSaab
ZRModel9-3
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeSedan
5Seats5
3/5Doors4

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationSaab 9-3
10,0 s0–100 km/h11,0 s
185 km/hTop speed200 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2171 cc
113 HPPower125 HP
260 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationSaab 9-3
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank62 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,2 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption6,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationSaab 9-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears6
205/50 R16Tyre size215/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationSaab 9-3
4011 mmLength4635 mm
1690 mmWidth1762 mm
1400 mmHeight1466 mm
1155 KgWeight1610 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Saab 9-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…