DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Peugeot 307 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationPeugeot 307
MGMakePeugeot
ZRModel307
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationPeugeot 307
10,0 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
185 km/hTop speed205 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1997 cc
113 HPPower136 HP
260 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationPeugeot 307
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank60 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption7,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationPeugeot 307
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationPeugeot 307
4011 mmLength4202 mm
1690 mmWidth1730 mm
1400 mmHeight1510 mm
1155 KgWeight1202 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2608 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Peugeot 307 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…