DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Mazda 6 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 6
MGMakeMazda
ZRModel6
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 6
10,0 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
185 km/hTop speed194 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1998 cc
113 HPPower121 HP
260 NmTorque310 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 6
DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,7 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption6,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 6
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/65 R15 H
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 6
4011 mmLength4700 mm
1690 mmWidth1780 mm
1400 mmHeight1480 mm
1155 KgWeight1465 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2675 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Mazda 6 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…