DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Mazda 323 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 323
MGMakeMazda
ZRModel323
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 323
10,0 s0–100 km/h9,7 s
185 km/hTop speed203 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1991 cc
113 HPPower130 HP
260 NmTorque171 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 323
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption11,2 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,9 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption8,5 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 323
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/50 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationMazda 323
4011 mmLength4290 mm
1690 mmWidth1705 mm
1400 mmHeight1420 mm
1155 KgWeight1185 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2610 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Mazda 323 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…