DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Hyundai Coupe Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationHyundai Coupe
MGMakeHyundai
ZRModelCoupe
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeCoupe
5Seats4
3/5Doors3

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationHyundai Coupe
10,0 s0–100 km/h9,1 s
185 km/hTop speed208 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1975 cc
113 HPPower143 HP
260 NmTorque186 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationHyundai Coupe
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption10,9 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,4 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationHyundai Coupe
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationHyundai Coupe
4011 mmLength4395 mm
1690 mmWidth1760 mm
1400 mmHeight1330 mm
1155 KgWeight1280 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2530 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Hyundai Coupe approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…