DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Great Wall Pegasus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeGreat Wall
ZRModelPegasus
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2237 cc
113 HPPower105 HP
260 NmTorque190 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank64 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size235/75 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4011 mmLength4820 mm
1690 mmWidth1870 mm
1400 mmHeight1700 mm
1155 KgWeight1710 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Great Wall Pegasus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…