DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Ford Focus Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MG ZRSpecificationFord Focus
MGMakeFord
ZRModelFocus
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeHatchback
5Seats5
3/5Doors3/5

Performance

MG ZRSpecificationFord Focus
10,0 s0–100 km/h9,2 s
185 km/hTop speed201 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement1988 cc
113 HPPower130 HP
260 NmTorque173 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

MG ZRSpecificationFord Focus
DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank55 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption11,8 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7,2 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption8,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

MG ZRSpecificationFord Focus
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size195/60 R15
YesABSYes

Dimensions

MG ZRSpecificationFord Focus
4011 mmLength4178 mm
1690 mmWidth1702 mm
1400 mmHeight1481 mm
1155 KgWeight1146 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Ford Focus approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…