DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeChrysler
ZRModelPT Cruiser
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeEstate
5Seats5
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h12,1 s
185 km/hTop speed183 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2148 cc
113 HPPower121 HP
260 NmTorque300 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typeDiesel
50 ltFuel tank57 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt
5,6 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size205/55 R16
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4011 mmLength4290 mm
1690 mmWidth1705 mm
1400 mmHeight1600 mm
1155 KgWeight1540 Kg
2502 mmWheelbase2615 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Chrysler PT Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…