DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2003 MG ZR vs 2003 Chevrolet Tavera Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

MG ZR

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

60.25–59.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MGMakeChevrolet
ZRModelTavera
2003Model year2003
HatchbackBody typeMinivan
5Seats7
3/5Doors5

Performance

10,0 s0–100 km/h—
185 km/hTop speed0 km/h
1994 ccEngine displacement2190 cc
113 HPPower117 HP
260 NmTorque183 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank0 lt
7,7 ltUrban consumption—
4,2 ltExtra-urban consumption—
5,6 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainRear-wheel drive
5Gears5
205/50 R16Tyre size—
YesABS—

Dimensions

4011 mmLength—
1690 mmWidth—
1400 mmHeight—
1155 KgWeight—
2502 mmWheelbase—

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2003 MG ZR and 2003 Chevrolet Tavera approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, MG ZR leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…