1990 • Mercury
Tracer
Mercury Tracer 1.9 (88 Hp) 1990Overall Score55.25/100
1990 Mercury Tracer vs 1990 Audi 100 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Audi
100
Audi 100 1.8 (90 Hp) 1990Overall Score54.25/100
WINNER
Mercury Tracer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
55.25–54.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mercury TracerSpecificationAudi 100
MercuryMakeAudi
TracerModel100
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Mercury TracerSpecificationAudi 100
—0–100 km/h12,0 s
170 km/hTop speed176 km/h
1859 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
88 HPPower90 HP
146 NmTorque150 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mercury TracerSpecificationAudi 100
PetrolFuel typePetrol
50 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Average consumption10,9 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Mercury TracerSpecificationAudi 100
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R13Tyre size185/70 R14
YesABS—
Dimensions
Mercury TracerSpecificationAudi 100
4341 mmLength4793 mm
1695 mmWidth1814 mm
1338 mmHeight1421 mm
1030 KgWeight1200 Kg
2500 mmWheelbase2687 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Mercury Tracer and 1990 Audi 100 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…