1990 • Toyota
Chaser
Toyota Chaser 1.8i (105 Hp) 1990Overall Score55.5/100
1990 Toyota Chaser vs 1990 Mercury Tracer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Mercury
Tracer
Mercury Tracer 1.9 (88 Hp) 1990Overall Score55.25/100
WINNER
Toyota Chaser
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points.
55.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota ChaserSpecificationMercury Tracer
ToyotaMakeMercury
ChaserModelTracer
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Toyota ChaserSpecificationMercury Tracer
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1838 ccEngine displacement1859 cc
105 HPPower88 HP
149 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Toyota ChaserSpecificationMercury Tracer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank50 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
5,3 ltExtra-urban consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota ChaserSpecificationMercury Tracer
Rear-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota ChaserSpecificationMercury Tracer
4690 mmLength4341 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1375 mmHeight1338 mm
—Weight1030 Kg
2680 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Toyota Chaser and 1990 Mercury Tracer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Toyota Chaser leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.25 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…