1990 • Audi
80
Audi 80 1.8 (90 Hp) 1990Overall Score54.25/100
1990 Audi 80 vs 1990 Mercury Tracer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Mercury
Tracer
Mercury Tracer 1.9 (88 Hp) 1990Overall Score55.25/100
WINNER
Mercury Tracer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
54.25–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Audi 80SpecificationMercury Tracer
AudiMakeMercury
80ModelTracer
1990Model year1990
SedanBody typeSedan
5Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Audi 80SpecificationMercury Tracer
12,3 s0–100 km/h—
180 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1859 cc
90 HPPower88 HP
150 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Audi 80SpecificationMercury Tracer
PetrolFuel typePetrol
68 ltFuel tank50 lt
8,9 ltAverage consumption—
Transmission & Chassis
Audi 80SpecificationMercury Tracer
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
175/70 R14Tyre size175/70 R13
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Audi 80SpecificationMercury Tracer
4393 mmLength4341 mm
1695 mmWidth1695 mm
1397 mmHeight1338 mm
1130 KgWeight1030 Kg
2546 mmWheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Audi 80 and 1990 Mercury Tracer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…