1990 • Toyota
MasterAce
Toyota MasterAce 2.0 DT (85 Hp) 1990Overall Score54.5/100
1990 Toyota MasterAce vs 1990 Mercury Tracer Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
1990 • Mercury
Tracer
Mercury Tracer 1.9 (88 Hp) 1990Overall Score55.25/100
WINNER
Mercury Tracer
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
54.5–55.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Toyota MasterAceSpecificationMercury Tracer
ToyotaMakeMercury
MasterAceModelTracer
1990Model year1990
—Body typeSedan
—Seats5
4Doors4
Performance
Toyota MasterAceSpecificationMercury Tracer
0 km/hTop speed170 km/h
1975 ccEngine displacement1859 cc
83 HPPower88 HP
174 NmTorque146 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Transmission & Chassis
Toyota MasterAceSpecificationMercury Tracer
—DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
—Gears5
—Tyre size175/70 R13
—ABSYes
Dimensions
Toyota MasterAceSpecificationMercury Tracer
—Length4341 mm
—Width1695 mm
—Height1338 mm
—Weight1030 Kg
—Wheelbase2500 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
1990 Toyota MasterAce and 1990 Mercury Tracer approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mercury Tracer leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableMercury Tracer vs Toyota MasterAce1990 and 1990 model years
VSImage unavailableAudi 100 vs Toyota MasterAce1990 and 1990 model years
VSImage unavailableAudi 80 vs Toyota MasterAce1990 and 1990 model years
VSImage unavailableFord Sierra vs Toyota MasterAce1990 and 1990 model years
VSImage unavailableNissan Skyline vs Toyota MasterAce1990 and 1990 model yearsComments are loading…