DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Tribute vs 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
TributeModelLand Cruiser
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors3

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h12,5 s
190 km/hTop speed165 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement2982 cc
203 HPPower163 HP
265 NmTorque343 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
61 ltFuel tank90 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption11,7 lt
9,3 ltExtra-urban consumption8,2 lt
12,8 ltAverage consumption10,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears5
235/70 R16 105 STyre size215/80 R16 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4305 mm
1825 mmWidth1730 mm
1765 mmHeight1855 mm
1590 KgWeight1835 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2365 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Tribute and 2000 Toyota Land Cruiser approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…