DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Toyota Land Cruiser vs 2000 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

ToyotaMakeMazda
Land CruiserModelTribute
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
3Doors5

Performance

12,5 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
165 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2982 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
163 HPPower203 HP
343 NmTorque265 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

DieselFuel typePetrol
90 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,7 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
8,2 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt
10,4 ltAverage consumption12,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
5Gears4
215/80 R16 STyre size235/70 R16 105 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4305 mmLength4395 mm
1730 mmWidth1825 mm
1855 mmHeight1765 mm
1835 KgWeight1590 Kg
2365 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Toyota Land Cruiser and 2000 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…