DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Buick Regal vs 2000 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

BuickMakeMazda
RegalModelTribute
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

10,8 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
200 km/hTop speed190 km/h
2980 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
172 HPPower203 HP
256 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank61 lt
11,2 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt
—Average consumption12,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
4Gears4
225/60 R16Tyre size235/70 R16 105 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4940 mmLength4395 mm
1845 mmWidth1825 mm
1440 mmHeight1765 mm
1550 KgWeight1590 Kg
2770 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Buick Regal and 2000 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…