DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Subaru Outback vs 2000 Mazda Tribute Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

62.5–63.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

SubaruMakeMazda
OutbackModelTribute
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeOff-road vehicle
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

8,9 s0–100 km/h11,8 s
210 km/hTop speed190 km/h
3000 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
209 HPPower203 HP
0 NmTorque265 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
64 ltFuel tank61 lt
14,0 ltUrban consumption15,7 lt
7,6 ltExtra-urban consumption9,3 lt
9,9 ltAverage consumption12,8 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears4
215/60 R16; 215/55 R17Tyre size235/70 R16 105 S
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4730 mmLength4395 mm
1770 mmWidth1825 mm
1545 mmHeight1765 mm
1610 KgWeight1590 Kg
2670 mmWheelbase2620 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Subaru Outback and 2000 Mazda Tribute approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…