DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda Tribute vs 2000 Subaru Outback Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda Tribute

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

63.25–62.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeSubaru
TributeModelOutback
2000Model year2000
Off-road vehicleBody typeEstate
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

11,8 s0–100 km/h8,9 s
190 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2967 ccEngine displacement3000 cc
203 HPPower209 HP
265 NmTorque0 Nm
6Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
61 ltFuel tank64 lt
15,7 ltUrban consumption14,0 lt
9,3 ltExtra-urban consumption7,6 lt
12,8 ltAverage consumption9,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
4Gears4
235/70 R16 105 STyre size215/60 R16; 215/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4395 mmLength4730 mm
1825 mmWidth1770 mm
1765 mmHeight1545 mm
1590 KgWeight1610 Kg
2620 mmWheelbase2670 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda Tribute and 2000 Subaru Outback approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda Tribute leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…