DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-3 vs 2000 Volkswagen Polo Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolkswagen
MX-3ModelPolo
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeSedan
2+2Seats5
2Doors4

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h11,1 s
197 km/hTop speed180 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1781 cc
107 HPPower97 HP
134 NmTorque152 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank45 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption8,3 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption6,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3975 mmLength4164 mm
1675 mmWidth1640 mm
1230 mmHeight1414 mm
990 KgWeight1100 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2441 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-3 and 2000 Volkswagen Polo approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…