DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Peugeot 306 vs 2000 Mazda MX-3 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

PeugeotMakeMazda
306ModelMX-3
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2

Performance

15,7 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
176 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
101 HPPower107 HP
153 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
60 ltFuel tank48 lt
12,9 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
6,9 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4338 mmLength3975 mm
1680 mmWidth1675 mm
1415 mmHeight1230 mm
1185 KgWeight990 Kg
2580 mmWheelbase2265 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Peugeot 306 and 2000 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…