2000 • Volkswagen
Polo
Volkswagen Polo 1.8 (97 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
2000 Volkswagen Polo vs 2000 Mazda MX-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
MX-3
Mazda MX-3 1.6i (107 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Mazda MX-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMazda MX-3
VolkswagenMakeMazda
PoloModelMX-3
2000Model year2000
SedanBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
4Doors2
Performance
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMazda MX-3
11,1 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
180 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1781 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
97 HPPower107 HP
152 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMazda MX-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
45 ltFuel tank48 lt
8,3 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
6,3 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMazda MX-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Volkswagen PoloSpecificationMazda MX-3
4164 mmLength3975 mm
1640 mmWidth1675 mm
1414 mmHeight1230 mm
1100 KgWeight990 Kg
2441 mmWheelbase2265 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Volkswagen Polo and 2000 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…