2000 • Citroen
Xsara
Citroen Xsara 1.8 i (101 Hp) 2000Overall Score50.25/100
2000 Citroen Xsara vs 2000 Mazda MX-3 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2000 • Mazda
MX-3
Mazda MX-3 1.6i (107 Hp) 2000Overall Score51.25/100
WINNER
Mazda MX-3
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.
50.25–51.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda MX-3
CitroenMakeMazda
XsaraModelMX-3
2000Model year2000
EstateBody typeCoupe
5Seats2+2
5Doors2
Performance
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda MX-3
15,8 s0–100 km/h10,5 s
177 km/hTop speed197 km/h
1762 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
101 HPPower107 HP
153 NmTorque134 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda MX-3
PetrolFuel typePetrol
54 ltFuel tank48 lt
13 ltUrban consumption10,1 lt
7 ltExtra-urban consumption6,2 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda MX-3
Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
4Gears5
185/65 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes
Dimensions
Citroen XsaraSpecificationMazda MX-3
4167 mmLength3975 mm
1698 mmWidth1675 mm
1405 mmHeight1230 mm
1070 KgWeight990 Kg
2540 mmWheelbase2265 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2000 Citroen Xsara and 2000 Mazda MX-3 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…