DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-3 vs 2000 Citroen Xsara Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeCitroen
MX-3ModelXsara
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeEstate
2+2Seats5
2Doors5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h15,8 s
197 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1762 cc
107 HPPower101 HP
134 NmTorque153 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank54 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption13 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears4
185/60 R14Tyre size185/65 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3975 mmLength4167 mm
1675 mmWidth1698 mm
1230 mmHeight1405 mm
990 KgWeight1070 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2540 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-3 and 2000 Citroen Xsara approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…