DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2000 Mazda MX-3 vs 2000 Chevrolet Corsa Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda MX-3

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 1 points.

51.25–50.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeChevrolet
MX-3ModelCorsa
2000Model year2000
CoupeBody typeHatchback
2+2Seats5
2Doors3/5

Performance

10,5 s0–100 km/h9,9 s
197 km/hTop speed177 km/h
1598 ccEngine displacement1598 cc
107 HPPower92 HP
134 NmTorque127 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
48 ltFuel tank46 lt
10,1 ltUrban consumption8,1 lt
6,2 ltExtra-urban consumption5,6 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Front-wheel driveDrivetrainFront-wheel drive
5Gears5
185/60 R14Tyre size185/60 R14
YesABSYes

Dimensions

3975 mmLength3730 mm
1675 mmWidth1610 mm
1230 mmHeight1390 mm
990 KgWeight975 Kg
2265 mmWheelbase2445 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2000 Mazda MX-3 and 2000 Chevrolet Corsa approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda MX-3 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 1 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…