2016 • Mazda
CX-4
Mazda CX-4 2.5 SKYACTIV-G (192 Hp) 2016Overall Score74.25/100
2016 Mazda CX-4 vs 2016 Buick Regal Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 2.4 (200 Hp) 2016Overall Score73.5/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-4
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
74.25–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Mazda CX-4SpecificationBuick Regal
MazdaMakeBuick
CX-4ModelRegal
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4
Performance
Mazda CX-4SpecificationBuick Regal
198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2384 cc
192 HPPower200 HP
252 NmTorque280 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Mazda CX-4SpecificationBuick Regal
PetrolFuel typeHybrid – Petrol / Electric
51 ltFuel tank59 lt
—Urban consumption9,4 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Mazda CX-4SpecificationBuick Regal
4633 mmLength4831 mm
1840 mmWidth1857 mm
1535 mmHeight1483 mm
1545 KgWeight1633 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2738 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Mazda CX-4 and 2016 Buick Regal approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VSImage unavailableToyota Crown vs Mazda CX-42016 and 2016 model yearsVSImage unavailableBuick Regal vs Mazda CX-42016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableHyundai Grandeur/Azera vs Mazda CX-42016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableAcura TLX vs Mazda CX-42016 and 2016 model yearsImage unavailableVSImage unavailableInfiniti QX50 vs Mazda CX-42016 and 2016 model yearsComments are loading…