2016 • Buick
Regal
Buick Regal 2.4 (200 Hp) 2016Overall Score73.5/100
2016 Buick Regal vs 2016 Mazda CX-4 Comparison
Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.
2016 • Mazda
CX-4
Mazda CX-4 2.5 SKYACTIV-G (192 Hp) 2016Overall Score74.25/100
WINNER
Mazda CX-4
Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.
73.5–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS
Every difference between the two cars
Basic Specifications
Buick RegalSpecificationMazda CX-4
BuickMakeMazda
RegalModelCX-4
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5
Performance
Buick RegalSpecificationMazda CX-4
0 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2384 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
200 HPPower192 HP
280 NmTorque252 Nm
4Cylinders4
Fuel & Consumption
Buick RegalSpecificationMazda CX-4
Hybrid – Petrol / ElectricFuel typePetrol
59 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,4 ltUrban consumption—
6,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,1 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt
Transmission & Chassis
Dimensions
Buick RegalSpecificationMazda CX-4
4831 mmLength4633 mm
1857 mmWidth1840 mm
1483 mmHeight1535 mm
1633 KgWeight1545 Kg
2738 mmWheelbase2700 mm
E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note
2016 Buick Regal and 2016 Mazda CX-4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.
Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.
SIMILAR COMPARISONS
Similar comparisons
Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.
VS
VS
VSComments are loading…