DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Acura TLX vs 2016 Mazda CX-4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Acura TLXSpecificationMazda CX-4
AcuraMakeMazda
TLXModelCX-4
2016Model year2016
SedanBody typeSUV
5Seats5
4Doors5

Performance

Acura TLXSpecificationMazda CX-4
8,2 s0–100 km/h—
210 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2356 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
206 HPPower192 HP
247 NmTorque252 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Acura TLXSpecificationMazda CX-4
PetrolFuel typePetrol
65 ltFuel tank51 lt
9,8 ltUrban consumption—
6,7 ltExtra-urban consumption—
8,4 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Acura TLXSpecificationMazda CX-4
Front-wheel driveDrivetrain4x4
8 SportShiftGears6
225/55 R17Tyre size225/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Acura TLXSpecificationMazda CX-4
4834 mmLength4633 mm
1854 mmWidth1840 mm
1448 mmHeight1535 mm
1580 KgWeight1545 Kg
2776 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Acura TLX and 2016 Mazda CX-4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…