DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Infiniti QX50 vs 2016 Mazda CX-4 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

73.5–74.25
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

InfinitiMakeMazda
QX50ModelCX-4
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

9,5 s0–100 km/h—
206 km/hTop speed198 km/h
2496 ccEngine displacement2488 cc
222 HPPower192 HP
252 NmTorque252 Nm
6Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
80 ltFuel tank51 lt
14,6 ltUrban consumption—
8,5 ltExtra-urban consumption—
10,7 ltAverage consumption7,3 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
7Gears6
225/55 R18; 245/45 R19Tyre size225/55 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4745 mmLength4633 mm
1800 mmWidth1840 mm
1613 mmHeight1535 mm
1843 KgWeight1545 Kg
2880 mmWheelbase2700 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Infiniti QX50 and 2016 Mazda CX-4 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…