DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-4 vs 2017 Volkswagen Amarok Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.25–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeVolkswagen
CX-4ModelAmarok
2016Model year2017
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,6-9.9 s
198 km/hTop speed173 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2967 cc
192 HPPower163 HP
252 NmTorque450 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typeDiesel
51 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption10,0 lt
—Extra-urban consumption7,0 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,1 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R19Tyre size245/65 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4633 mmLength5254 mm
1840 mmWidth1954 mm
1535 mmHeight1834 mm
1545 KgWeight1949 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase3097 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-4 and 2017 Volkswagen Amarok approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…