DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-4 vs 2017 Toyota Camry Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.25–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeToyota
CX-4ModelCamry
2016Model year2017
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2487 cc
192 HPPower203 HP
252 NmTorque249 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank55 lt
—Urban consumption8,1 lt
—Extra-urban consumption5,7 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption6,9 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears8 Direct Shift
225/55 R19Tyre size205/65 R16; 215/55 R17; 235/45 R18; 235/40 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4633 mmLength4879 mm
1840 mmWidth1839 mm
1535 mmHeight1445 mm
1545 KgWeight1470 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2824 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-4 and 2017 Toyota Camry approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…