DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-4 vs 2016 Acura TLX Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.25–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

Mazda CX-4SpecificationAcura TLX
MazdaMakeAcura
CX-4ModelTLX
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSedan
5Seats5
5Doors4

Performance

Mazda CX-4SpecificationAcura TLX
—0–100 km/h8,2 s
198 km/hTop speed210 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2356 cc
192 HPPower206 HP
252 NmTorque247 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

Mazda CX-4SpecificationAcura TLX
PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank65 lt
—Urban consumption9,8 lt
—Extra-urban consumption6,7 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption8,4 lt

Transmission & Chassis

Mazda CX-4SpecificationAcura TLX
4x4DrivetrainFront-wheel drive
6Gears8 SportShift
225/55 R19Tyre size225/55 R17
YesABSYes

Dimensions

Mazda CX-4SpecificationAcura TLX
4633 mmLength4834 mm
1840 mmWidth1854 mm
1535 mmHeight1448 mm
1545 KgWeight1580 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2776 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-4 and 2016 Acura TLX approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…