DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-4 vs 2016 Infiniti QX50 Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.25–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeInfiniti
CX-4ModelQX50
2016Model year2016
SUVBody typeSUV
5Seats5
5Doors5

Performance

—0–100 km/h9,5 s
198 km/hTop speed206 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2496 cc
192 HPPower222 HP
252 NmTorque252 Nm
4Cylinders6

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank80 lt
—Urban consumption14,6 lt
—Extra-urban consumption8,5 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption10,7 lt

Transmission & Chassis

4x4Drivetrain4x4
6Gears7
225/55 R19Tyre size225/55 R18; 245/45 R19
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4633 mmLength4745 mm
1840 mmWidth1800 mm
1535 mmHeight1613 mm
1545 KgWeight1843 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase2880 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-4 and 2016 Infiniti QX50 approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…