DETAILED CAR COMPARISON

2016 Mazda CX-4 vs 2015 GMC Canyon Comparison

Compare technical specifications, scores and everyday-use differences side by side.

VS
WINNER

Mazda CX-4

Leads the overall E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points.

74.25–73.5
SPECIFICATION GROUPS

Every difference between the two cars

Basic Specifications

MazdaMakeGMC
CX-4ModelCanyon
2016Model year2015
SUVBody typePick-up
5Seats4
5Doors4

Performance

198 km/hTop speed0 km/h
2488 ccEngine displacement2457 cc
192 HPPower200 HP
252 NmTorque259 Nm
4Cylinders4

Fuel & Consumption

PetrolFuel typePetrol
51 ltFuel tank79 lt
—Urban consumption12,3 lt
—Extra-urban consumption9,0 lt
7,3 ltAverage consumption—

Transmission & Chassis

4x4DrivetrainRear-wheel drive
6Gears6
225/55 R19Tyre size265/70 R16; 255/65 R17; 265/60 R18
YesABSYes

Dimensions

4633 mmLength5395 mm
1840 mmWidth1886 mm
1535 mmHeight1795 mm
1545 KgWeight1805 Kg
2700 mmWheelbase3258 mm

E-Kıyasla Editor’s Note

2016 Mazda CX-4 and 2015 GMC Canyon approach the same decision from different angles. We compare the exact versions so changes in engine, transmission, dimensions and equipment are not hidden behind the model names.

Overall, Mazda CX-4 leads the E-Kıyasla score by 0.75 points. The score provides a consistent summary, while the best choice can still change with priorities such as urban efficiency, luggage space, performance or equipment.

SIMILAR COMPARISONS

Similar comparisons

Explore related comparisons featuring cars from this matchup.

Comments are loading…